Still Does not Pay To Be Gay

From my point of law, I see the issue of gay marriages or civil unions as a civil rights.

federal civil rights laws prohibit discrimination against persons based on race, age or sex. As state legislatures can legally discriminate against a group of people - gay couples - based on their gender identity?

Having raised the issue for purely intellectual, I must admit that I am not a big fan of civil rights, and I do not defend them. Despite their egalitarian motives, are a misnomer.

Civil rights are neither civil nor right. The privileges bestowed by government on a group of people who always come at the expense of equal rights of others.

Marriage rights are civil privileges. Both government and business benefits to married people than the rest of us do not get and we fully supported. Licensed married people get preferential tax rates, better employee benefits and legal protections. Supporters of gay marriage or civil unions want to extend those privileges of marriage to gay couples.

I can not say I do ... and not because they are against anyone's sexual preferences. I do not want government by granting more privileges to none.

Heck, if gay couples get civil rights of marriage, there will be fewer classes disadvantaged population to subsidize the taxes and insurance rates of heterosexual married couples. How fair that the individual be like me and normal living?

It 'something to exercise our natural right to marry in God' s another to force others who are unlicensed to subsidize our behavior, hetero or otherwise.

We would be better to dismantle the privileges of particular interest, not add to them. Also, I would not on any government privileges. Government servants are equipped with too much responsibility.

marriage licenses grant the state power to divide marital assets at the whim of the General Assembly. I do not understand why gay couples want their relationship subject to our state legislators.

Ultimately I'd like to see all the authorized persons released from their commitments to the government unnecessary. This includes not only married persons licensing, but licensing lawyers, doctors, electricians and sports coaches.

The government can not certify the quality of doctors or lawyers through licensing agreements that can guarantee the quality of marriages or civil unions.

professions licensed to use government as a bully against unlicensed - and therefore not privileged competitors -. All professional licenses are licenses to steal your chance to hire someone perhaps more qualified, but willing to follow orders of the government. Consumers have better tools for licensing to assess the quality professional.

The history of marriage licenses is also clear cargo interests. marriage licenses were once used - perhaps invented - to discourage interracial relationships. Currently used to discourage gay relationships. Heterosexuality has its privileges, and still does not pay to be gay.

Disadvantaged for singles and couples without a license - gay or otherwise - Let's aspire to remain unlicensed. Let's exercise our God-given rights instead of seeking government permission to exercise them. We work to get our own house in order.

Licensed or not, all adults can draft a will or a trust to pass their property at death of their loved one (s), regardless of gender. Nobody needs a marriage license to fulfill this important function.

No pair need legislators that defines the property rights of each Party respectively shall be dissolved if its report. This can and should be done by contract - not just by gay couples, but also husbands and wives.

I am in solidarity with the people - gay or not - that employers do not extend the privilege to certain employment benefits for their live-in co-inhabitants, as do the couple married employees'. The solutions to this are the best employers, the government added a category of people to its list A.

There is only one valid justification for marriage licenses - the convenience of law. Are useful to the courts to determine legal relationships, duties and powers, when couples break or testify.

However, the common law privilege against spousal testimony earlier forced marriage licenses. marriage licenses were not legally required to prove their marital status.

There would be smart to get government completely out of wedlock and give to God, and belongs where it all began.

God, not government, manage and punish all our love relationships. Government to make available to preside over our material disputes.